I remember being a young newlywed and saying to my husband, “If
I ever become my mother, you have permission to shoot me.”
The fact is, my mother was a devoted wife to my father for
over fifty years. He felt privileged to
have her on his arm and was embarrassingly open about his love for her. From the time she met him—as a substitute for
a blind date to her freshman beach party—she catered to him on every level,
fulfilling the image of the perfect housewife of the 50s and 60s.
I do not think my mother has ever gotten over the fact that
her only daughter had no interest in emulating her life. I am the product of a different generation,
one where a woman is not defined by the man who keeps her. My mother’s love of whiter whites, infinite
books of green stamps, and dinner on the table at six made me cry for her. I once made the mistake of asking her if, once
all the kids left for college, she might have fun getting out of the house and
getting a job. She was furious. “I don’t have
to work,” was her only reply. In her generation, a working girl was an
unfortunate woman who failed to net a good marriage.
My husband and I hit the professional world at about the
same time. I got my master’s degree and
began a career in my chosen industry. My
husband graduated from dental school and began a prestigious oral surgery
residency. One day I was shocked to hear
my mother criticize him for what she perceived as his selfishness. She saw him as relying on me to “support him”
while he neglected his Harvard education and husbandly responsibilities. “I’m embarrassed for you,” she said gravely.
There is an expression designed for just such
situations: “What we have here is a
failure to communicate.” I would not
have changed my circumstances for the world.
I not only worked voluntarily, I pursued an advanced degree in order to
enter my field. Although incredibly frustrating and a little
sad, I have difficulty feeling angry at my mother for what she believes. She comes by her values honestly; they have served
her well over a long life. I do not
waste my time trying to enlighten one who worked at teasing hair and trading
recipes while turning a blind eye toward women who raised the glass
ceiling. But when she tries to make me
over in her image, that is when she runs afoul of my good graces. I will never be Mom 2.0.
But it is harder than you think to escape your roots. Most people’s paradigm for household operations
comes from how their mother kept house.
The brands that our mothers used for toothpaste, dish soap and laundry
detergent become our factory settings.
We are accustomed to a very particular scent on our sheets, or the
picker-upper strength of certain paper towels, or the implied quality of labels,
such as Heinz Ketchup or Hellman’s Mayonnaise.
My mother has a particular way of
folding a paper napkin diagonally, and a relentless preference for heavy terry
cloth dish towels.
My home is set up to my preferences, which are decidedly—if not
intentionally—counter to my mother’s. I
fold napkins in half crosswise and place them with the fold out, the cut edges tucked neatly under
the plate. I use an out-facing fold because
I read a book of etiquette as a child that contradicted my mother’s custom of
tucking the fold under the plate. I fold crosswise because that is the way Annie
Sullivan taught Helen Keller to fold her napkin. It was one of the first activities that
helped break through Keller’s silence, connecting her with the rest of the
world. She went on to graduate from
Radcliffe College. When I received my
degree from the same institution—76 years later—I thought of her as they handed
me my diploma.
I am deliberate and purposeful in the organization of my
home. I am no Suzy Homemaker; keeping
house is an odious chore to me—not a joy.
I prioritize: clean is important
while neat is less so. My mother just cannot bring herself to let me run
my household my way. As I roll my husband’s socks into the matched
balls he prefers, she clicks her tongue and asks, “You stretch out his socks
like that?” She would prefer that I
faux-iron the socks with my hands, restore them to the flat shape they assumed
when purchased, and then fold them to look brand new as I set them in perfect
stacks in my husband’s drawer. She did
this for my father for over fifty years, which makes her the undisputed
authority on men’s socks.
Cooking in my mother’s presence requires an agile
defense. I leave my green beans long (“Your father
likes them cut up”) and I boil long-cooking brown rice (“Minute Rice is faster”).
When
a crumb drops on the kitchen floor and I don’t stop cooking to pounce on it,
she exhales sharply and asks, “Should I get that for you?” For almost thirty years I have run my own
household—far longer than the seventeen years I spent in hers. While I am competent enough to get my family
nourished and our friends entertained, under my mother’s critical eye I am
forever flawed because I am not her.
All of this notwithstanding, Nature is a devious beast. I’ve
spent the better part of a lifetime of trying to craft myself as an original, designing
my own pattern and fighting for the right to do so. But we cannot hide from our DNA; we are the pre-printed
immortality of our parents. More and more, I see flashes of my mother—in the
way I hold my hands, in the way I purse my lips, sometimes even in the sound of
my own voice. I have been running away
my whole life from a static world where my mother rules, but I have not
escaped. I have merely recreated a
parallel world where my values apply. In
the end, it is less a battle of substance and more a struggle for identity. Me, 1.0.
Tomorrow's blog: Antiques Like Me
Tomorrow's blog: Antiques Like Me
No comments:
Post a Comment